WHY HAVE I MADE HIM THUS--- I WILL MAKE A NEW CREATION.

WHAT I LEARNED BY STUDING PHYSICS- WORKING TITLE.

The first thing I learned by studying physics was that E=MC
squared is a Newtonian equation.
It does not work for velocities approaching the speed of light.
That is another of Einsteins equations.
Which I will not quote here except to say that it includes
momentum.
And as a result of momentum being determined by state.
When you have four states in one as I propose for the big bang.
You have a different E=MC squared for the begining.
Can you work out what E=MCsquared would be if the four states of
matter were one.
This is important because potential energy from the big crunch
could be stored by matter if it was four states in one.
And there could be a superforce including gravity.
Which could be analogous to the 1919 molassas explosion in
Boston.
Where two million gallons of molasses spontaneously exploded.
And produced a vacume which could have been the superforce
including gravity.
If Iam right the state of matter determines whether the four
forces are one.
And the physics hasn't been written yet.That is OK Iam writing
it.
I knew the big bang needed a mechanism and decided that was a
phase change and state.
But that is not how I arrived at my definition.
It was a definition in an old wikkapedia which said Opposite
particles X and Y cannot be in the SAME STATE at the SAME TIME in
the SAME PLACE EXCEPTION PRIOR TO THE BIG BANG.
Red Dermott Mullin further refined this by 1/3 BOSE EINSTEIN
STATISTICS+ 1/3 BOSE EINSTEIN STATS+ 1/3 FERMI DIRAC STATS= 1
BOSE/FERMI ULTIMATE PARTICLE OR STRING.
So prior to the big bang different laws apply to particles and
strings.
REDS PROPOSAL..........GOD REJECTS and God might in fact.
Because God accepts creation ex-nihilo and that means a non
contradictory begining for the universe.
The reason is that Aristotles law of non contradiction is
supposed to describe how God creates.
So don't turn me over to the inquisition because I think that
althought the big bang is likely to be a contradiction.
Creation ex-nihilo is not contradiction to the laws of
thermodynamics because energy is gotten from another dimension or
universe.
To balance the universal equation 2+2=4.
But the equation does not balance for a contradictory mechanism
for the big bang.
This is because to make up for the energy that is lost with each
cycle of the universe from big crunch to big bang.
The universe must become more massive as we go backward in time.
The mechanism for this is unknown but it must balance 2+2=4.
otherwise the basis of our maths isn't right.
And if the universe becomes more massive as you go backward in
time with infinite time there is an infinite mass.
So Hawking is right the universe doesn't have a begining and
doesn't continue forever.
But that of course doesn't make sense it can't be both.
The implication is that if infinite mass is a dealbreaker as it
was with Einstein.
Then it must prove that the universe did have a begining at some
time.
So we are back to square one if we make the begining further back
in time that still does not explain it.
The camel can't pass through the eye of a needle that has to do
with Quantum uncertainty.
But to me that camel is a black hole and shrunk down to a needle
the size of a quanta it explains how the very big and the very
small can be unified 2+2=4.
We can add Hawking radiation for a black hole the size of a
quanta to Hawking radiation for a big Einstein black hole.
And use this as the key to adding the whole standard equation to
Einsteins general theory of relativity.
And what do we get 2 DIMENSION+ 2 DIMENSIONS= 4 DIMENSIONS= 1/3
TIME+ 1/3 SPACE+ 1/3 SPACE= 1 TIME/SPACE.
= 11 DIMENSIONS.
We can make Einstien equal 11 dimensions if 4 is equal to 11.
22+22=44.
Now that is an equation.
But the real answer is 24= 2*6+2*6=4*6.
That is the Jesus answer for everything and is equal to the
number of particles in the standard theory of physics.
WHY IT IS NO SO? is 42 the Antichrists answer to life the
universe and everything.
In the bible 24 means Gods government and 42 means the
antichrists government.
Why is 24 so.? And why is 42 not so.?
Clearly they are opposite answers and both cannot be true.
So this puts paid to my idea of YING YANG.
1 ODD+ 1 EVEN=2 ODD.
2 ODD+ 2 EVEN=4 EVEN.
So clearly one of the above answers is right but not both.
The universe is not explained by two.
But by one.
But if it is explained by one then 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3
ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
Where apples and oranges are quantum mechanics and Einsteins
theory of relativity......
One doesn't explain it because one is a contradiction in terms.
And a contradiction shouldn't be the answer.
That is why two answers YING AND YANG makes perfect sense to
anyone but me.
Because I know how utterly boring it is to add equations 2+2=4
you can prove anything that way.
And never reach a final conlusion.
But if there are two answers we can express the final theory of
everything now as 2+2=4.
We can make it one but this it is no longer the mathematics of
Whitehead.
So you love my answers.
I don't have many more.
To me shinking the black hole to the size of a quanta is the
ultimate answer to making the big and the small one.
And compressing it through the eye of a quanta needle when it is
atom sized is the ultimate answer to Hawkings problem with
gravity.
You can add the standard theory eqaution to Newtons theory of
gravity 2+2=4.
That is not hard but now substitute Einsteins equations for
gravity and string theory equations for the graviton.
I can predict what you will get you will have to ask the question
Why is it not so.?
The reason why it is so is the reason why it is not so is not so
convincing......
You can answer all questions or you can't that is what Godels
theorem is all about.
And I tend to agree with Hawking that Godel proves that any
theory of everything will be incomplete.
My computer program adds physics equations imported from
wikkapedia with Maths type 6 2+2=4.
And you get BABLE.
But you should get a Quantum theory of everything.
Unless it is ID.
And I say it is ID you can print out thousands of equations with
the computer and divide them to one equation and use guassian
elimination for two ( new rules) to get the answer.
One equation for everything.
But you need great minds to analyse the random output and look
for patterns.
It takes a great mind to understand the mind of God.
I have not got a great mind.
Iam thinking others thoughts after them like Harold Jeffreys
rather than thinking the thoughts of God after him.
But Harold would have said aristotle is wrong and the universe
really is a contradiction at the big bang.
It is apparently this imperfection in symmetry that makes
galaxies and stars and planets exist.
I have no answers scientific advance in my mind has only lead to
me asking more accurate questions to quote Hawking.
But Hawking is not satisfied that this is all there is to
science.
But Iam.
We can ask questions about the how just like religion asks the
questions about the why.
But do we ever get really satisfying answers to these kind of
questions.
Or is our knowledge incomplete.?
This essay is incomplete but at least I offer a mechanism for the
big bang which is more than anyone else has done.
So when I suppose the Big crunch universe is a Godel then Iam
proposing Godels incomplete theory of everything.
The big bang is a contradiction because the big crunch universe
is a Godel which is contradictory in time/space.
The black hole in a Godel universe when penrose equations for it
are reversed produced a non contradictory begining for our
universe.
The same as if pi works out so meanigless infinitis can be
eliminated from the thoery of everything by 2+2=4